Source code: Lib/email/__init__.py
The email
package is a library for managing email messages, including MIME and other RFC 2822-based message documents. It is specifically not designed to do any sending of email messages to SMTP (RFC 2821), NNTP, or other servers; those are functions of modules such as smtplib
and nntplib
. The email
package attempts to be as RFC-compliant as possible, supporting in addition to RFC 2822, such MIME-related RFCs as RFC 2045, RFC 2046, RFC 2047, and RFC 2231.
The primary distinguishing feature of the email
package is that it splits the parsing and generating of email messages from the internal object model representation of email. Applications using the email
package deal primarily with objects; you can add sub-objects to messages, remove sub-objects from messages, completely re-arrange the contents, etc. There is a separate parser and a separate generator which handles the transformation from flat text to the object model, and then back to flat text again. There are also handy subclasses for some common MIME object types, and a few miscellaneous utilities that help with such common tasks as extracting and parsing message field values, creating RFC-compliant dates, etc.
The following sections describe the functionality of the email
package. The ordering follows a progression that should be common in applications: an email message is read as flat text from a file or other source, the text is parsed to produce the object structure of the email message, this structure is manipulated, and finally, the object tree is rendered back into flat text.
It is perfectly feasible to create the object structure out of whole cloth — i.e. completely from scratch. From there, a similar progression can be taken as above.
Also included are detailed specifications of all the classes and modules that the email
package provides, the exception classes you might encounter while using the email
package, some auxiliary utilities, and a few examples. For users of the older mimelib
package, or previous versions of the email
package, a section on differences and porting is provided.
Contents of the email
package documentation:
- 19.1.1.
email.message
: Representing an email message -
19.1.2.
email.parser
: Parsing email messages - 19.1.3.
email.generator
: Generating MIME documents - 19.1.4.
email.policy
: Policy Objects - 19.1.5.
email.headerregistry
: Custom Header Objects -
19.1.6.
email.contentmanager
: Managing MIME Content - 19.1.7.
email.mime
: Creating email and MIME objects from scratch - 19.1.8.
email.header
: Internationalized headers - 19.1.9.
email.charset
: Representing character sets - 19.1.10.
email.encoders
: Encoders - 19.1.11.
email.errors
: Exception and Defect classes - 19.1.12.
email.utils
: Miscellaneous utilities - 19.1.13.
email.iterators
: Iterators -
19.1.14.
email
: Examples
15. Package History
This table describes the release history of the email package, corresponding to the version of Python that the package was released with. For purposes of this document, when you see a note about change or added versions, these refer to the Python version the change was made in, not the email package version. This table also describes the Python compatibility of each version of the package.
email version | distributed with | compatible with |
---|---|---|
1.x | Python 2.2.0 to Python 2.2.1 | no longer supported |
2.5 | Python 2.2.2+ and Python 2.3 | Python 2.1 to 2.5 |
3.0 | Python 2.4 and Python 2.5 | Python 2.3 to 2.6 |
4.0 | Python 2.5 to Python 2.7 | Python 2.3 to 2.7 |
5.0 | Python 3.0 and Python 3.1 | Python 3.0 to 3.2 |
5.1 | Python 3.2 | Python 3.2 |
After Version 5.1 (Python 3.2), the email package no longer has a version that is separate from the Python version. (See the What’s New in Python documents for the respective Python versions for details on changes.)
Here are the major differences between email
version 5.1 and version 5.0:
- It is once again possible to parse messages containing non-ASCII bytes, and to reproduce such messages if the data containing the non-ASCII bytes is not modified.
- New functions
message_from_bytes()
andmessage_from_binary_file()
, and new classesBytesFeedParser
andBytesParser
allow binary message data to be parsed into model objects. - Given bytes input to the model,
get_payload()
will by default decode a message body that has a Content-Transfer-Encoding of8bit
using the charset specified in the MIME headers and return the resulting string. - Given bytes input to the model,
Generator
will convert message bodies that have a Content-Transfer-Encoding of 8bit to instead have a 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding. - New class
BytesGenerator
produces bytes as output, preserving any unchanged non-ASCII data that was present in the input used to build the model, including message bodies with a Content-Transfer-Encoding of 8bit.
Here are the major differences between email
version 5.0 and version 4:
- All operations are on unicode strings. Text inputs must be strings, text outputs are strings. Outputs are limited to the ASCII character set and so can be encoded to ASCII for transmission. Inputs are also limited to ASCII; this is an acknowledged limitation of email 5.0 and means it can only be used to parse email that is 7bit clean.
Here are the major differences between email
version 4 and version 3:
- All modules have been renamed according to PEP 8 standards. For example, the version 3 module
email.Message
was renamed toemail.message
in version 4. -
A new subpackage
email.mime
was added and all the version 3email.MIME*
modules were renamed and situated into theemail.mime
subpackage. For example, the version 3 moduleemail.MIMEText
was renamed toemail.mime.text
.Note that the version 3 names will continue to work until Python 2.6.
- The
email.mime.application
module was added, which contains theMIMEApplication
class. - Methods that were deprecated in version 3 have been removed. These include
Generator.__call__()
,Message.get_type()
,Message.get_main_type()
,Message.get_subtype()
. - Fixes have been added for RFC 2231 support which can change some of the return types for
Message.get_param
and friends. Under some circumstances, values which used to return a 3-tuple now return simple strings (specifically, if all extended parameter segments were unencoded, there is no language and charset designation expected, so the return type is now a simple string). Also, %-decoding used to be done for both encoded and unencoded segments; this decoding is now done only for encoded segments.
Here are the major differences between email
version 3 and version 2:
- The
FeedParser
class was introduced, and theParser
class was implemented in terms of theFeedParser
. All parsing therefore is non-strict, and parsing will make a best effort never to raise an exception. Problems found while parsing messages are stored in the message’s defect attribute. - All aspects of the API which raised
DeprecationWarning
s in version 2 have been removed. These include the _encoder argument to theMIMEText
constructor, theMessage.add_payload()
method, theUtils.dump_address_pair()
function, and the functionsUtils.decode()
andUtils.encode()
. - New
DeprecationWarning
s have been added to:Generator.__call__()
,Message.get_type()
,Message.get_main_type()
,Message.get_subtype()
, and the strict argument to theParser
class. These are expected to be removed in future versions. - Support for Pythons earlier than 2.3 has been removed.
Here are the differences between email
version 2 and version 1:
- The
email.Header
andemail.Charset
modules have been added. - The pickle format for
Message
instances has changed. Since this was never (and still isn’t) formally defined, this isn’t considered a backward incompatibility. However if your application pickles and unpicklesMessage
instances, be aware that inemail
version 2,Message
instances now have private variables _charset and _default_type. - Several methods in the
Message
class have been deprecated, or their signatures changed. Also, many new methods have been added. See the documentation for theMessage
class for details. The changes should be completely backward compatible. -
The object structure has changed in the face of message/rfc822 content types. In
email
version 1, such a type would be represented by a scalar payload, i.e. the container message’sis_multipart()
returned false,get_payload()
was not a list object, but a singleMessage
instance.This structure was inconsistent with the rest of the package, so the object representation for message/rfc822 content types was changed. In
email
version 2, the container does returnTrue
fromis_multipart()
, andget_payload()
returns a list containing a singleMessage
item.Note that this is one place that backward compatibility could not be completely maintained. However, if you’re already testing the return type of
get_payload()
, you should be fine. You just need to make sure your code doesn’t do aset_payload()
with aMessage
instance on a container with a content type of message/rfc822. - The
Parser
constructor’s strict argument was added, and itsparse()
andparsestr()
methods grew a headersonly argument. The strict flag was also added to functionsemail.message_from_file()
andemail.message_from_string()
. -
Generator.__call__()
is deprecated; useGenerator.flatten
instead. TheGenerator
class has also grown theclone()
method. - The
DecodedGenerator
class in theemail.generator
module was added. - The intermediate base classes
MIMENonMultipart
andMIMEMultipart
have been added, and interposed in the class hierarchy for most of the other MIME-related derived classes. - The _encoder argument to the
MIMEText
constructor has been deprecated. Encoding now happens implicitly based on the _charset argument. - The following functions in the
email.Utils
module have been deprecated:dump_address_pairs()
,decode()
, andencode()
. The following functions have been added to the module:make_msgid()
,decode_rfc2231()
,encode_rfc2231()
, anddecode_params()
. - The non-public function
email.Iterators._structure()
was added.
16. Differences from mimelib
The email
package was originally prototyped as a separate library called mimelib. Changes have been made so that method names are more consistent, and some methods or modules have either been added or removed. The semantics of some of the methods have also changed. For the most part, any functionality available in mimelib
is still available in the email
package, albeit often in a different way. Backward compatibility between the mimelib
package and the email
package was not a priority.
Here is a brief description of the differences between the mimelib
and the email
packages, along with hints on how to port your applications.
Of course, the most visible difference between the two packages is that the package name has been changed to email
. In addition, the top-level package has the following differences:
-
messageFromString()
has been renamed tomessage_from_string()
. -
messageFromFile()
has been renamed tomessage_from_file()
.
The Message
class has the following differences:
- The method
asString()
was renamed toas_string()
. - The method
ismultipart()
was renamed tois_multipart()
. - The
get_payload()
method has grown a decode optional argument. - The method
getall()
was renamed toget_all()
. - The method
addheader()
was renamed toadd_header()
. - The method
gettype()
was renamed toget_type()
. - The method
getmaintype()
was renamed toget_main_type()
. - The method
getsubtype()
was renamed toget_subtype()
. - The method
getparams()
was renamed toget_params()
. Also, whereasgetparams()
returned a list of strings,get_params()
returns a list of 2-tuples, effectively the key/value pairs of the parameters, split on the'='
sign. - The method
getparam()
was renamed toget_param()
. - The method
getcharsets()
was renamed toget_charsets()
. - The method
getfilename()
was renamed toget_filename()
. - The method
getboundary()
was renamed toget_boundary()
. - The method
setboundary()
was renamed toset_boundary()
. - The method
getdecodedpayload()
was removed. To get similar functionality, pass the value 1 to the decode flag of theget_payload()
method. - The method
getpayloadastext()
was removed. Similar functionality is supported by theDecodedGenerator
class in theemail.generator
module. - The method
getbodyastext()
was removed. You can get similar functionality by creating an iterator withtyped_subpart_iterator()
in theemail.iterators
module.
The Parser
class has no differences in its public interface. It does have some additional smarts to recognize message/delivery-status type messages, which it represents as a Message
instance containing separate Message
subparts for each header block in the delivery status notification [1].
The Generator
class has no differences in its public interface. There is a new class in the email.generator
module though, called DecodedGenerator
which provides most of the functionality previously available in the Message.getpayloadastext()
method.
The following modules and classes have been changed:
- The
MIMEBase
class constructor arguments _major and _minor have changed to _maintype and _subtype respectively. - The
Image
class/module has been renamed toMIMEImage
. The _minor argument has been renamed to _subtype. - The
Text
class/module has been renamed toMIMEText
. The _minor argument has been renamed to _subtype. -
The
MessageRFC822
class/module has been renamed toMIMEMessage
. Note that an earlier version ofmimelib
called this class/moduleRFC822
, but that clashed with the Python standard library modulerfc822
on some case-insensitive file systems.Also, the
MIMEMessage
class now represents any kind of MIME message with main type message. It takes an optional argument _subtype which is used to set the MIME subtype. _subtype defaults to rfc822.
mimelib
provided some utility functions in its address
and date
modules. All of these functions have been moved to the email.utils
module.
The MsgReader
class/module has been removed. Its functionality is most closely supported in the body_line_iterator()
function in the email.iterators
module.
Footnotes
[1] | Delivery Status Notifications (DSN) are defined in RFC 1894. |
Please login to continue.