Associations are a set of macro-like class methods for tying objects
together through foreign keys. They express relationships like “Project has
one Project Manager” or “Project belongs
to a Portfolio”. Each macro adds a number of methods to the class which are
specialized according to the collection or association symbol and the
options hash. It works much the same way as Ruby's own
attr*
methods.
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :portfolio has_one :project_manager has_many :milestones has_and_belongs_to_many :categories end
The project class now has the following methods (and more) to ease the traversal and manipulation of its relationships:
-
Project#portfolio, Project#portfolio=(portfolio), Project#portfolio.nil?
-
Project#project_manager, Project#project_manager=(project_manager), Project#project_manager.nil?,
-
Project#milestones.empty?, Project#milestones.size, Project#milestones, Project#milestones<<(milestone),
Project#milestones.delete(milestone), Project#milestones.destroy(milestone), Project#milestones.find(milestone_id),
Project#milestones.build, Project#milestones.create
-
Project#categories.empty?, Project#categories.size, Project#categories, Project#categories<<(category1),
Project#categories.delete(category1), Project#categories.destroy(category1)
A word of warning
Don't create associations that have the same name as instance methods
of ActiveRecord::Base
. Since the association adds a method
with that name to its model, it will override the inherited method and
break things. For instance, attributes
and
connection
would be bad choices for association names.
Auto-generated methods
Singular associations (one-to-one)
| | belongs_to | generated methods | belongs_to | :polymorphic | has_one ----------------------------------+------------+--------------+--------- other | X | X | X other=(other) | X | X | X build_other(attributes={}) | X | | X create_other(attributes={}) | X | | X create_other!(attributes={}) | X | | X
Collection associations (one-to-many / many-to-many)
| | | has_many generated methods | habtm | has_many | :through ----------------------------------+-------+----------+---------- others | X | X | X others=(other,other,...) | X | X | X other_ids | X | X | X other_ids=(id,id,...) | X | X | X others<< | X | X | X others.push | X | X | X others.concat | X | X | X others.build(attributes={}) | X | X | X others.create(attributes={}) | X | X | X others.create!(attributes={}) | X | X | X others.size | X | X | X others.length | X | X | X others.count | X | X | X others.sum(*args) | X | X | X others.empty? | X | X | X others.clear | X | X | X others.delete(other,other,...) | X | X | X others.delete_all | X | X | X others.destroy(other,other,...) | X | X | X others.destroy_all | X | X | X others.find(*args) | X | X | X others.exists? | X | X | X others.distinct | X | X | X others.uniq | X | X | X others.reset | X | X | X
Overriding generated methods
Association methods are generated in a module that is included into the
model class, which allows you to easily override with your own methods and
call the original generated method with super
. For example:
class Car < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :owner belongs_to :old_owner def owner=(new_owner) self.old_owner = self.owner super end end
If your model class is Project
, the module is named
Project::GeneratedFeatureMethods
. The GeneratedFeatureMethods
module is included in the model class immediately after the (anonymous)
generated attributes methods module, meaning an association will override
the methods for an attribute with the same name.
Cardinality and associations
Active Record associations can be used to
describe one-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relationships between
models. Each model uses an association to describe its role in the
relation. The belongs_to
association is always used in the
model that has the foreign key.
One-to-one
Use has_one
in the base, and belongs_to
in the
associated model.
class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :office end class Office < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :employee # foreign key - employee_id end
One-to-many
Use has_many
in the base, and belongs_to
in the
associated model.
class Manager < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :employees end class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :manager # foreign key - manager_id end
Many-to-many
There are two ways to build a many-to-many relationship.
The first way uses a has_many
association with the
:through
option and a join model, so there are two stages of
associations.
class Assignment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :programmer # foreign key - programmer_id belongs_to :project # foreign key - project_id end class Programmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assignments has_many :projects, through: :assignments end class Project < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assignments has_many :programmers, through: :assignments end
For the second way, use has_and_belongs_to_many
in both
models. This requires a join table that has no corresponding model or
primary key.
class Programmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :projects # foreign keys in the join table end class Project < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :programmers # foreign keys in the join table end
Choosing which way to build a many-to-many relationship is not always
simple. If you need to work with the relationship model as its own entity,
use has_many :through
. Use
has_and_belongs_to_many
when working with legacy schemas or
when you never work directly with the relationship itself.
Is it a belongs_to
or has_one
association?
Both express a 1-1 relationship. The difference is mostly where to place
the foreign key, which goes on the table for the class declaring the
belongs_to
relationship.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base # I reference an account. belongs_to :account end class Account < ActiveRecord::Base # One user references me. has_one :user end
The tables for these classes could look something like:
CREATE TABLE users ( id int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, account_id int(11) default NULL, name varchar default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) CREATE TABLE accounts ( id int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, name varchar default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) )
Unsaved objects and associations
You can manipulate objects and associations before they are saved to the database, but there is some special behavior you should be aware of, mostly involving the saving of associated objects.
You can set the :autosave
option on a has_one
,
belongs_to
, has_many
, or
has_and_belongs_to_many
association. Setting it to
true
will always save the members, whereas setting it
to false
will never save the members. More details
about :autosave
option is available at AutosaveAssociation.
One-to-one associations
-
Assigning an object to a
has_one
association automatically saves that object and the object being replaced (if there is one), in order to update their foreign keys - except if the parent object is unsaved (new_record? == true
). -
If either of these saves fail (due to one of the objects being invalid), an
ActiveRecord::RecordNotSaved
exception is raised and the assignment is cancelled. -
If you wish to assign an object to a
has_one
association without saving it, use thebuild_association
method (documented below). The object being replaced will still be saved to update its foreign key. -
Assigning an object to a
belongs_to
association does not save the object, since the foreign key field belongs on the parent. It does not save the parent either.
Collections
-
Adding an object to a collection (
has_many
orhas_and_belongs_to_many
) automatically saves that object, except if the parent object (the owner of the collection) is not yet stored in the database. -
If saving any of the objects being added to a collection (via
push
or similar) fails, thenpush
returnsfalse
. -
If saving fails while replacing the collection (via
association=
), anActiveRecord::RecordNotSaved
exception is raised and the assignment is cancelled. -
You can add an object to a collection without automatically saving it by using the
collection.build
method (documented below). -
All unsaved (
new_record? == true
) members of the collection are automatically saved when the parent is saved.
Customizing the query
Associations are built from Relation
s, and you can use the
Relation
syntax to customize them. For example, to add a
condition:
class Blog < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :published_posts, -> { where published: true }, class_name: 'Post' end
Inside the -> { ... }
block you can use all of the usual
Relation
methods.
Accessing the owner object
Sometimes it is useful to have access to the owner object when building the query. The owner is passed as a parameter to the block. For example, the following association would find all events that occur on the user's birthday:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :birthday_events, ->(user) { where starts_on: user.birthday }, class_name: 'Event' end
Association callbacks
Similar to the normal callbacks that hook into the life cycle of an Active Record object, you can also define callbacks that get triggered when you add an object to or remove an object from an association collection.
class Project has_and_belongs_to_many :developers, after_add: :evaluate_velocity def evaluate_velocity(developer) ... end end
It's possible to stack callbacks by passing them as an array. Example:
class Project has_and_belongs_to_many :developers, after_add: [:evaluate_velocity, Proc.new { |p, d| p.shipping_date = Time.now}] end
Possible callbacks are: before_add
, after_add
,
before_remove
and after_remove
.
Should any of the before_add
callbacks throw an exception, the
object does not get added to the collection. Same with the
before_remove
callbacks; if an exception is thrown the object
doesn't get removed.
Association extensions
The proxy objects that control the access to associations can be extended through anonymous modules. This is especially beneficial for adding new finders, creators, and other factory-type methods that are only used as part of this association.
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people do def find_or_create_by_name(name) first_name, last_name = name.split(" ", 2) find_or_create_by(first_name: first_name, last_name: last_name) end end end person = Account.first.people.find_or_create_by_name("David Heinemeier Hansson") person.first_name # => "David" person.last_name # => "Heinemeier Hansson"
If you need to share the same extensions between many associations, you can use a named extension module.
module FindOrCreateByNameExtension def find_or_create_by_name(name) first_name, last_name = name.split(" ", 2) find_or_create_by(first_name: first_name, last_name: last_name) end end class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people, -> { extending FindOrCreateByNameExtension } end class Company < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people, -> { extending FindOrCreateByNameExtension } end
Some extensions can only be made to work with knowledge of the
association's internals. Extensions can access relevant state using the
following methods (where items
is the name of the
association):
-
record.association(:items).owner
- Returns the object the association is part of. -
record.association(:items).reflection
- Returns the reflection object that describes the association. -
record.association(:items).target
- Returns the associated object forbelongs_to
andhas_one
, or the collection of associated objects forhas_many
andhas_and_belongs_to_many
.
However, inside the actual extension code, you will not have access to the
record
as above. In this case, you can access
proxy_association
. For example,
record.association(:items)
and
record.items.proxy_association
will return the same object,
allowing you to make calls like proxy_association.owner
inside
association extensions.
Association Join Models
Has Many associations can be configured with the :through
option to use an explicit join model to retrieve the data. This operates
similarly to a has_and_belongs_to_many
association. The
advantage is that you're able to add validations, callbacks, and extra
attributes on the join model. Consider the following schema:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :authorships has_many :books, through: :authorships end class Authorship < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :author belongs_to :book end @author = Author.first @author.authorships.collect { |a| a.book } # selects all books that the author's authorships belong to @author.books # selects all books by using the Authorship join model
You can also go through a has_many
association on the join
model:
class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients has_many :invoices, through: :clients end class Client < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :firm has_many :invoices end class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :client end @firm = Firm.first @firm.clients.collect { |c| c.invoices }.flatten # select all invoices for all clients of the firm @firm.invoices # selects all invoices by going through the Client join model
Similarly you can go through a has_one
association on the join
model:
class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :users has_many :avatars, through: :users end class User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :group has_one :avatar end class Avatar < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user end @group = Group.first @group.users.collect { |u| u.avatar }.compact # select all avatars for all users in the group @group.avatars # selects all avatars by going through the User join model.
An important caveat with going through has_one
or
has_many
associations on the join model is that these
associations are read-only. For example, the following
would not work following the previous example:
@group.avatars << Avatar.new # this would work if User belonged_to Avatar rather than the other way around @group.avatars.delete(@group.avatars.last) # so would this
Setting Inverses
If you are using a belongs_to
on the join model, it is a good
idea to set the :inverse_of
option on the
belongs_to
, which will mean that the following example works
correctly (where tags
is a has_many
:through
association):
@post = Post.first @tag = @post.tags.build name: "ruby" @tag.save
The last line ought to save the through record (a Taggable
).
This will only work if the :inverse_of
is set:
class Taggable < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :post belongs_to :tag, inverse_of: :taggings end
If you do not set the :inverse_of
record, the association will
do its best to match itself up with the correct inverse. Automatic inverse
detection only works on has_many
, has_one
, and
belongs_to
associations.
Extra options on the associations, as defined in the
AssociationReflection::INVALID_AUTOMATIC_INVERSE_OPTIONS
constant, will also prevent the association's inverse from being found
automatically.
The automatic guessing of the inverse association uses a heuristic based on the name of the class, so it may not work for all associations, especially the ones with non-standard names.
You can turn off the automatic detection of inverse associations by setting
the :inverse_of
option to false
like so:
class Taggable < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :tag, inverse_of: false end
Nested Associations
You can actually specify any association with the
:through
option, including an association which has a
:through
option itself. For example:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts has_many :comments, through: :posts has_many :commenters, through: :comments end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments end class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :commenter end @author = Author.first @author.commenters # => People who commented on posts written by the author
An equivalent way of setting up this association this would be:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts has_many :commenters, through: :posts end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments has_many :commenters, through: :comments end class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :commenter end
When using nested association, you will not be able to modify the
association because there is not enough information to know what
modification to make. For example, if you tried to add a
Commenter
in the example above, there would be no way to tell
how to set up the intermediate Post
and Comment
objects.
Polymorphic Associations
Polymorphic associations on models are not restricted on what types of
models they can be associated with. Rather, they specify an interface that
a has_many
association must adhere to.
class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :attachable, polymorphic: true end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assets, as: :attachable # The :as option specifies the polymorphic interface to use. end @asset.attachable = @post
This works by using a type column in addition to a foreign key to specify
the associated record. In the Asset example, you'd need an
attachable_id
integer column and an
attachable_type
string column.
Using polymorphic associations in combination with single table inheritance
(STI) is a little tricky. In order for the associations to work as
expected, ensure that you store the base model for the STI models in the
type column of the polymorphic association. To continue with the asset
example above, suppose there are guest posts and member posts that use the
posts table for STI. In this case, there must be a type
column
in the posts table.
Note: The attachable_type=
method is being called when
assigning an attachable
. The class_name
of the
attachable
is passed as a String.
class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :attachable, polymorphic: true def attachable_type=(class_name) super(class_name.constantize.base_class.to_s) end end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base # because we store "Post" in attachable_type now dependent: :destroy will work has_many :assets, as: :attachable, dependent: :destroy end class GuestPost < Post end class MemberPost < Post end
Caching
All of the methods are built on a simple caching principle that will keep the result of the last query around unless specifically instructed not to. The cache is even shared across methods to make it even cheaper to use the macro-added methods without worrying too much about performance at the first go.
project.milestones # fetches milestones from the database project.milestones.size # uses the milestone cache project.milestones.empty? # uses the milestone cache project.milestones(true).size # fetches milestones from the database project.milestones # uses the milestone cache
Eager loading of associations
Eager loading is a way to find objects of a certain class and a number of named associations. This is one of the easiest ways of to prevent the dreaded 1+N problem in which fetching 100 posts that each need to display their author triggers 101 database queries. Through the use of eager loading, the 101 queries can be reduced to 2.
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :author has_many :comments end
Consider the following loop using the class above:
Post.all.each do |post| puts "Post: " + post.title puts "Written by: " + post.author.name puts "Last comment on: " + post.comments.first.created_on end
To iterate over these one hundred posts, we'll generate 201 database queries. Let's first just optimize it for retrieving the author:
Post.includes(:author).each do |post|
This references the name of the belongs_to
association that
also used the :author
symbol. After loading the posts, find
will collect the author_id
from each one and load all the
referenced authors with one query. Doing so will cut down the number of
queries from 201 to 102.
We can improve upon the situation further by referencing both associations in the finder with:
Post.includes(:author, :comments).each do |post|
This will load all comments with a single query. This reduces the total
number of queries to 3. More generally the number of queries will be 1 plus
the number of associations named (except if some of the associations are
polymorphic belongs_to
- see below).
To include a deep hierarchy of associations, use a hash:
Post.includes(:author, {comments: {author: :gravatar}}).each do |post|
That'll grab not only all the comments but all their authors and gravatar pictures. You can mix and match symbols, arrays and hashes in any combination to describe the associations you want to load.
All of this power shouldn't fool you into thinking that you can pull out huge amounts of data with no performance penalty just because you've reduced the number of queries. The database still needs to send all the data to Active Record and it still needs to be processed. So it's no catch-all for performance problems, but it's a great way to cut down on the number of queries in a situation as the one described above.
Since only one table is loaded at a time, conditions or orders cannot reference tables other than the main one. If this is the case Active Record falls back to the previously used LEFT OUTER JOIN based strategy. For example
Post.includes([:author, :comments]).where(['comments.approved = ?', true])
This will result in a single SQL query with joins along the lines of:
LEFT OUTER JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id
and
LEFT OUTER JOIN authors ON authors.id = posts.author_id
. Note
that using conditions like this can have unintended consequences. In the
above example posts with no approved comments are not returned at all,
because the conditions apply to the SQL statement as a whole and not just
to the association.
If you want to load all posts (including posts with no approved comments) then write your own LEFT OUTER JOIN query using ON
Post.joins('LEFT OUTER JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id AND comments.approved = true')
You must disambiguate column references for this fallback to happen, for
example order: "author.name DESC"
will work but
order: "name DESC"
will not.
If you do want eager load only some members of an association it is usually more natural to include an association which has conditions defined on it:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :approved_comments, -> { where approved: true }, class_name: 'Comment' end Post.includes(:approved_comments)
This will load posts and eager load the approved_comments
association, which contains only those comments that have been approved.
If you eager load an association with a specified :limit
option, it will be ignored, returning all the associated objects:
class Picture < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :most_recent_comments, -> { order('id DESC').limit(10) }, class_name: 'Comment' end Picture.includes(:most_recent_comments).first.most_recent_comments # => returns all associated comments.
Eager loading is supported with polymorphic associations.
class Address < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :addressable, polymorphic: true end
A call that tries to eager load the addressable model
Address.includes(:addressable)
This will execute one query to load the addresses and load the addressables
with one query per addressable type. For example if all the addressables
are either of class Person or Company then a total of 3 queries will be
executed. The list of addressable types to load is determined on the back
of the addresses loaded. This is not supported if Active Record has to fallback to the previous
implementation of eager loading and will raise
ActiveRecord::EagerLoadPolymorphicError
. The reason is that
the parent model's type is a column value so its corresponding table
name cannot be put in the FROM
/JOIN
clauses of
that query.
Table Aliasing
Active Record uses table aliasing in the
case that a table is referenced multiple times in a join. If a table is
referenced only once, the standard table name is used. The second time, the
table is aliased as #{reflection_name}_#{parent_table_name}
.
Indexes are appended for any more successive uses of the table name.
Post.joins(:comments) # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments ON ... Post.joins(:special_comments) # STI # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments ON ... AND comments.type = 'SpecialComment' Post.joins(:comments, :special_comments) # special_comments is the reflection name, posts is the parent table name # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments ON ... INNER JOIN comments special_comments_posts
Acts as tree example:
TreeMixin.joins(:children) # => SELECT ... FROM mixins INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins ... TreeMixin.joins(children: :parent) # => SELECT ... FROM mixins INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins ... INNER JOIN parents_mixins ... TreeMixin.joins(children: {parent: :children}) # => SELECT ... FROM mixins INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins ... INNER JOIN parents_mixins ... INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins_2
Has and Belongs to Many join tables use the same idea, but add a
_join
suffix:
Post.joins(:categories) # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN categories_posts ... INNER JOIN categories ... Post.joins(categories: :posts) # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN categories_posts ... INNER JOIN categories ... INNER JOIN categories_posts posts_categories_join INNER JOIN posts posts_categories Post.joins(categories: {posts: :categories}) # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN categories_posts ... INNER JOIN categories ... INNER JOIN categories_posts posts_categories_join INNER JOIN posts posts_categories INNER JOIN categories_posts categories_posts_join INNER JOIN categories categories_posts_2
If you wish to specify your own custom joins using joins
method, those table names will take precedence over the eager associations:
Post.joins(:comments).joins("inner join comments ...") # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments_posts ON ... INNER JOIN comments ... Post.joins(:comments, :special_comments).joins("inner join comments ...") # => SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments comments_posts ON ... INNER JOIN comments special_comments_posts ... INNER JOIN comments ...
Table aliases are automatically truncated according to the maximum length of table identifiers according to the specific database.
Modules
By default, associations will look for objects within the current module scope. Consider:
module MyApplication module Business class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients end class Client < ActiveRecord::Base; end end end
When Firm#clients
is called, it will in turn call
MyApplication::Business::Client.find_all_by_firm_id(firm.id)
.
If you want to associate with a class in another module scope, this can be
done by specifying the complete class name.
module MyApplication module Business class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base; end end module Billing class Account < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :firm, class_name: "MyApplication::Business::Firm" end end end
Bi-directional associations
When you specify an association there is usually an association on the associated model that specifies the same relationship in reverse. For example, with the following models:
class Dungeon < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :traps has_one :evil_wizard end class Trap < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon end class EvilWizard < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon end
The traps
association on Dungeon
and the
dungeon
association on Trap
are the inverse of
each other and the inverse of the dungeon
association on
EvilWizard
is the evil_wizard
association on
Dungeon
(and vice-versa). By default, Active Record doesn't know anything about these
inverse relationships and so no object loading optimization is possible.
For example:
d = Dungeon.first t = d.traps.first d.level == t.dungeon.level # => true d.level = 10 d.level == t.dungeon.level # => false
The Dungeon
instances d
and
t.dungeon
in the above example refer to the same object data
from the database, but are actually different in-memory copies of that
data. Specifying the :inverse_of
option on associations lets
you tell Active Record about inverse
relationships and it will optimise object loading. For example, if we
changed our model definitions to:
class Dungeon < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :traps, inverse_of: :dungeon has_one :evil_wizard, inverse_of: :dungeon end class Trap < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon, inverse_of: :traps end class EvilWizard < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon, inverse_of: :evil_wizard end
Then, from our code snippet above, d
and
t.dungeon
are actually the same in-memory instance and our
final d.level == t.dungeon.level
will return
true
.
There are limitations to :inverse_of
support:
-
does not work with
:through
associations. -
does not work with
:polymorphic
associations. -
for
belongs_to
associationshas_many
inverse associations are ignored.
Deleting from associations
Dependent associations
has_many
, has_one
and belongs_to
associations support the :dependent
option. This allows you to
specify that associated records should be deleted when the owner is
deleted.
For example:
class Author has_many :posts, dependent: :destroy end Author.find(1).destroy # => Will destroy all of the author's posts, too
The :dependent
option can have different values which specify
how the deletion is done. For more information, see the documentation for
this option on the different specific association types. When no option is
given, the behavior is to do nothing with the associated records when
destroying a record.
Note that :dependent
is implemented using Rails' callback
system, which works by processing callbacks in order. Therefore, other
callbacks declared either before or after the :dependent
option can affect what it does.
Delete or destroy?
has_many
and has_and_belongs_to_many
associations
have the methods destroy
, delete
,
destroy_all
and delete_all
.
For has_and_belongs_to_many
, delete
and
destroy
are the same: they cause the records in the join table
to be removed.
For has_many
, destroy
and
destroy_all
will always call the destroy
method
of the record(s) being removed so that callbacks are run. However
delete
and delete_all
will either do the deletion
according to the strategy specified by the :dependent
option,
or if no :dependent
option is given, then it will follow the
default strategy. The default strategy is :nullify
(set the
foreign keys to nil
), except for has_many
:through
, where the default strategy is
delete_all
(delete the join records, without running their
callbacks).
There is also a clear
method which is the same as
delete_all
, except that it returns the association rather than
the records which have been deleted.
What gets deleted?
There is a potential pitfall here: has_and_belongs_to_many
and
has_many
:through
associations have records in
join tables, as well as the associated records. So when we call one of
these deletion methods, what exactly should be deleted?
The answer is that it is assumed that deletion on an association is about
removing the link between the owner and the associated object(s),
rather than necessarily the associated objects themselves. So with
has_and_belongs_to_many
and has_many
:through
, the join records will be deleted, but the associated
records won't.
This makes sense if you think about it: if you were to call
post.tags.delete(Tag.find_by(name: 'food'))
you would
want the 'food' tag to be unlinked from the post, rather than for
the tag itself to be removed from the database.
However, there are examples where this strategy doesn't make sense. For
example, suppose a person has many projects, and each project has many
tasks. If we deleted one of a person's tasks, we would probably not
want the project to be deleted. In this scenario, the delete method
won't actually work: it can only be used if the association on the join
model is a belongs_to
. In other situations you are expected to
perform operations directly on either the associated records or the
:through
association.
With a regular has_many
there is no distinction between the
“associated records” and the “link”, so there is only one choice for what
gets deleted.
With has_and_belongs_to_many
and has_many
:through
, if you want to delete the associated records
themselves, you can always do something along the lines of
person.tasks.each(&:destroy)
.
Type safety with ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
If you attempt to assign an object to an association that doesn't match
the inferred or specified :class_name
, you'll get an
ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
.
Options
All of the association macros can be specialized through options. This makes cases more complex than the simple and guessable ones possible.