@functools.total_ordering
Given a class defining one or more rich comparison ordering methods, this class decorator supplies the rest. This simplifies the effort involved in specifying all of the possible rich comparison operations:
The class must define one of __lt__()
, __le__()
, __gt__()
, or __ge__()
. In addition, the class should supply an __eq__()
method.
For example:
@total_ordering class Student: def _is_valid_operand(self, other): return (hasattr(other, "lastname") and hasattr(other, "firstname")) def __eq__(self, other): if not self._is_valid_operand(other): return NotImplemented return ((self.lastname.lower(), self.firstname.lower()) == (other.lastname.lower(), other.firstname.lower())) def __lt__(self, other): if not self._is_valid_operand(other): return NotImplemented return ((self.lastname.lower(), self.firstname.lower()) < (other.lastname.lower(), other.firstname.lower()))
Note
While this decorator makes it easy to create well behaved totally ordered types, it does come at the cost of slower execution and more complex stack traces for the derived comparison methods. If performance benchmarking indicates this is a bottleneck for a given application, implementing all six rich comparison methods instead is likely to provide an easy speed boost.
New in version 3.2.
Changed in version 3.4: Returning NotImplemented from the underlying comparison function for unrecognised types is now supported.
Please login to continue.