Comparison of different linear SVM classifiers on a 2D projection of the iris dataset. We only consider the first 2 features of this dataset:
- Sepal length
- Sepal width
This example shows how to plot the decision surface for four SVM classifiers with different kernels.
The linear models LinearSVC()
and SVC(kernel='linear')
yield slightly different decision boundaries. This can be a consequence of the following differences:
-
LinearSVC
minimizes the squared hinge loss whileSVC
minimizes the regular hinge loss. -
LinearSVC
uses the One-vs-All (also known as One-vs-Rest) multiclass reduction whileSVC
uses the One-vs-One multiclass reduction.
Both linear models have linear decision boundaries (intersecting hyperplanes) while the non-linear kernel models (polynomial or Gaussian RBF) have more flexible non-linear decision boundaries with shapes that depend on the kind of kernel and its parameters.
Note
while plotting the decision function of classifiers for toy 2D datasets can help get an intuitive understanding of their respective expressive power, be aware that those intuitions don?t always generalize to more realistic high-dimensional problems.
print(__doc__) import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from sklearn import svm, datasets # import some data to play with iris = datasets.load_iris() X = iris.data[:, :2] # we only take the first two features. We could # avoid this ugly slicing by using a two-dim dataset y = iris.target h = .02 # step size in the mesh # we create an instance of SVM and fit out data. We do not scale our # data since we want to plot the support vectors C = 1.0 # SVM regularization parameter svc = svm.SVC(kernel='linear', C=C).fit(X, y) rbf_svc = svm.SVC(kernel='rbf', gamma=0.7, C=C).fit(X, y) poly_svc = svm.SVC(kernel='poly', degree=3, C=C).fit(X, y) lin_svc = svm.LinearSVC(C=C).fit(X, y) # create a mesh to plot in x_min, x_max = X[:, 0].min() - 1, X[:, 0].max() + 1 y_min, y_max = X[:, 1].min() - 1, X[:, 1].max() + 1 xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.arange(x_min, x_max, h), np.arange(y_min, y_max, h)) # title for the plots titles = ['SVC with linear kernel', 'LinearSVC (linear kernel)', 'SVC with RBF kernel', 'SVC with polynomial (degree 3) kernel'] for i, clf in enumerate((svc, lin_svc, rbf_svc, poly_svc)): # Plot the decision boundary. For that, we will assign a color to each # point in the mesh [x_min, x_max]x[y_min, y_max]. plt.subplot(2, 2, i + 1) plt.subplots_adjust(wspace=0.4, hspace=0.4) Z = clf.predict(np.c_[xx.ravel(), yy.ravel()]) # Put the result into a color plot Z = Z.reshape(xx.shape) plt.contourf(xx, yy, Z, cmap=plt.cm.coolwarm, alpha=0.8) # Plot also the training points plt.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y, cmap=plt.cm.coolwarm) plt.xlabel('Sepal length') plt.ylabel('Sepal width') plt.xlim(xx.min(), xx.max()) plt.ylim(yy.min(), yy.max()) plt.xticks(()) plt.yticks(()) plt.title(titles[i]) plt.show()
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 0.690 seconds)
plot_iris.py
plot_iris.ipynb
Please login to continue.